Finally someone responds to a simple but important point. To amend the Constitution requires a constitutional amendment, not just legislation, and certainly not a signing statement.
Now how about some judge having the guts to stand up to the suspension of habeas corpus. To me that is the most blatant outrage.
5 comments:
Finally someone is trying to protect our rights.
I hope Bush can't get the ruling overturned.
Finally someone responds to a simple but important point. To amend the Constitution requires a constitutional amendment, not just legislation, and certainly not a signing statement.
Now how about some judge having the guts to stand up to the suspension of habeas corpus. To me that is the most blatant outrage.
I'm sure that Chimpy will persuade his lackeys "Stepnfetchit" Reid and "Persuadable" Pelosi to help him craft something even worse and get it passed.
He's always got the Supreme's to fall back on..(:
One step forward...and ten stepsback (these days). Go read Dusty's post about the FOI Act. You'll see what I mean.
And Larry- he doesn't need to get it overturned. He'll just ignore it.
Post a Comment